Mishra v University of Technology, Sydney [2000] NSWCA 312
Both grounds of Mr Mishra's appeal failed; the time limitation was complied with under the Rules and the Registry's acceptance of documents did not excuse his obligation to obtain leave for filing the appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Costs Order' 'time Limitations for Motions' 'filing Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the University's notice of motion to strike out the appeal was served within the required twenty-one day period under the Rules" 'Whether the acceptance of the appeal book by the Registry misled Mr Mishra regarding the validity of his appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
Both grounds of Mr Mishra's appeal failed; the time limitation was complied with under the Rules and the Registry's acceptance of documents did not excuse his obligation to obtain leave for filing the appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["Appeal against Registrar's costs order dismissed with costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment