Gaetjens v Arndale (Kilkenny) Pty Ltd
On the material before the Court, excluding evidence produced that morning by the respondent to the motion which the applicant had little or no opportunity to meet, the inference was open and drawn that the would-be appellant was prejudicially affected to the extent of at least $3,000 and that the case was one in which an appeal lay as of right; the motion was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / High Court of Australia Before Owen J
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal as of Right' 'prejudicial Effect of Judgment' 'costs of Motion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / High Court of Australia Before Owen J
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the would-be appellant was prejudicially affected by the judgment sought to be appealed from to the extent of at least $3,000 so that an appeal lay as of right.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the material before the Court, excluding evidence produced that morning by the respondent to the motion which the applicant had little or no opportunity to meet, the inference was open and drawn that the would-be appellant was prejudicially affected to the extent of at least $3,000 and that the case was one in which an appeal lay as of right; the motion was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Motion dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment