TRYMIND PTY LTD T/AS WHITE AND McKAYS GLASS v K AND W HAULAGE PTY LTD [1994] NSWCA 322
It is more efficient for the summons for leave to cross appeal to be determined by the court that hears the appeal proper; the question of leave is adjourned and reserved for that hearing.
- Parties
- Claimant: TRYMIND PTY LTD T/AS WHITE & McKAYS GLASS; Opponent: K & W HAULAGE PTY LTD
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Summons for Leave to Cross Appeal Adjourned
- Outcome
- Summons for leave to cross appeal stood over to be heard with the main appeal. No order as to costs of today's hearing; costs to be determined by court hearing the summons.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal as of Right, Summons for Leave to Cross Appeal, Procedural Economy, Cross Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TRYMIND PTY LTD T/AS WHITE & McKAYS GLASS
Claimant
K & W HAULAGE PTY LTD
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Summons for Leave to Cross Appeal Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to cross appeal should be determined now or stood over to be heard with the appeal
- 2 Whether there is an appeal as of right on the cross-appeal
Ratio Decidendi
It is more efficient for the summons for leave to cross appeal to be determined by the court that hears the appeal proper; the question of leave is adjourned and reserved for that hearing.
Court Disposition
Summons for leave to cross appeal stood over to be heard with the main appeal. No order as to costs of today's hearing; costs to be determined by court hearing the summons.
Orders
- Summons for leave to cross appeal is stood over to be listed on the day of the return of the opponent's appeal as of right.
- Written submissions ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment