Fieman v Balas [1930] HCA 39
So long as the verdict stands, the judgment is correct and the High Court cannot alter the verdict; thus, the appeal must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant; Plaintiff: John Fieman; Respondent; Defendant: Joseph Balas; Respondent; Defendant: Robert Leslie Forsyth; Respondent; Defendant: Hedley Frank Summons
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal From Jury Verdict, Trial by Jury, Setting Aside Verdict, Judgment on Verdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
John Fieman
Appellant; Plaintiff
Joseph Balas
Respondent; Defendant
Robert Leslie Forsyth
Respondent; Defendant
Hedley Frank Summons
Respondent; Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal lies to the High Court from a general verdict of a jury accompanied by a judgment in accordance therewith
Ratio Decidendi
So long as the verdict stands, the judgment is correct and the High Court cannot alter the verdict; thus, the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; judgment for the defendants to stand; appellant to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment