Nobarani v Mariconte [No 2]Citation:[2018] HCA 49Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:17 Oct 2018Case Number:S270/2017Read more
The Court held that the respondent's costs were properly and reasonably incurred in connection with the administration of the estate and should be paid out of the estate on a trustee basis, despite the grant of probate being set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Appeal / Judgment After Appeal
- Outcome
- Order granted in favour of respondent for costs to be paid out of the estate on a trustee basis.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Grant of Probate, Administration of Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate Appeal / Judgment After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's costs of trial and appeals should be paid out of the estate on a trustee basis after the grant of probate was set aside
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the respondent's costs were properly and reasonably incurred in connection with the administration of the estate and should be paid out of the estate on a trustee basis, despite the grant of probate being set aside.
Court Disposition
Order granted in favour of respondent for costs to be paid out of the estate on a trustee basis.
Orders
- Respondent's costs of trial and appeals to be paid out of the estate of the deceased on a trustee basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment