Park v The QueenCitation:[2021] HCA 37Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Edelman, Gleeson JJDate:10 Nov 2021Case Number:S61/2021Read more

Park v The QueenCitation:[2021] HCA 37Before:Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Edelman, Gleeson JJDate:10 Nov 2021Case Number:S61/2021Read more

The sentence that the court 'would otherwise have imposed' cannot exceed the jurisdictional limit; the indicative sentence must not be above the jurisdictional maximum, even before applying any discount for a guilty plea.

Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Plea of Guilty, Jurisdictional Limits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence that the court 'would otherwise have imposed' can exceed the jurisdictional limit when applying a discount for a guilty plea.

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence that the court 'would otherwise have imposed' cannot exceed the jurisdictional limit; the indicative sentence must not be above the jurisdictional maximum, even before applying any discount for a guilty plea.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence set aside
  • Matter remitted for re-sentencing in accordance with the law