Applicant A17/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1080
The applicant failed to fully comply with the orders requiring, by 19 September 2003, a notice of motion and affidavit seeking an extension of time. Because the order made on 5 September 2003 was self-executing, the application stood dismissed on 20 September 2003, and no further time was granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Order Nisi in Respect of Constitutional Writs Against the Respondents / Remitted Proceeding in the Federal Court; Application Dismissed After Failure to Comply With Self Executing Directions Order
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'constitutional Writs' 'non Compliance With Court Orders' 'self Executing Dismissal Order' 'transfer to Federal Magistrates Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order Nisi in Respect of Constitutional Writs Against the Respondents / Remitted Proceeding in the Federal Court; Application Dismissed After Failure to Comply With Self Executing Directions Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's failure to file and serve a notice of motion and affidavit seeking an extension of time meant the application stood dismissed under the self-executing order made on 5 September 2003." 'Whether the applicant should be given further time to comply with paragraph 1(a) of the orders of Selway J.' 'Whether the proceeding was appropriate to transfer to the Federal Magistrates Court.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to fully comply with the orders requiring, by 19 September 2003, a notice of motion and affidavit seeking an extension of time. Because the order made on 5 September 2003 was self-executing, the application stood dismissed on 20 September 2003, and no further time was granted.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of the application.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment