Applicant A220 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 379

The application for constitutional writs is dismissed because the applicant failed to comply with court orders and did not prosecute the matter.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 22 March 2004
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Remitter From High Court
Outcome: application dismissed and costs ordered against applicant
Legal Topics: ['constitutional Writs' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Compliance' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Remitter From High Court

1 ["Whether the applicant's failure to comply with court orders justifies dismissal of the application" "Whether further adjournment should be granted in light of applicant's absence and lack of compliance"]

The application for constitutional writs is dismissed because the applicant failed to comply with court orders and did not prosecute the matter.

application dismissed and costs ordered against applicant

["The applicant's application for the issue of constitutional writs be dismissed." "The applicant to pay the respondents' costs."]