Applicant M57 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 287

Applicant M57 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 287

The country information was relevant to the applicant's claim that he had a well-founded fear of persecution in Sri Lanka because of his membership of the United National Party. The applicant's real complaint concerned the weight the Refugee Review Tribunal gave that information in its fact-finding. That did not demonstrate that the Tribunal took into account irrelevant material or otherwise went beyond jurisdiction, so no arguable case for an order nisi was shown.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Migration Judicial Review Application for an Order Nisi / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia; Federal Court Considered Whether an Order Nisi Should Issue
Outcome
Application for an order nisi refused with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'order Nisi' 'jurisdictional Error' 'irrelevant Considerations' 'country Information' 'ministerial Discretion Under S417 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'order Nisi' 'jurisdictional Error' 'irrelevant Considerations' 'country Information' 'ministerial Discretion Under S417 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Judicial Review Application for an Order Nisi / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia; Federal Court Considered Whether an Order Nisi Should Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant had an arguable case that the Refugee Review Tribunal went beyond its jurisdiction.' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by relying on irrelevant country information in a way that affected the exercise of its power.' "Whether the applicant's complaint was in substance a challenge to the weight given by the Refugee Review Tribunal to relevant country information."]

Ratio Decidendi

The country information was relevant to the applicant's claim that he had a well-founded fear of persecution in Sri Lanka because of his membership of the United National Party. The applicant's real complaint concerned the weight the Refugee Review Tribunal gave that information in its fact-finding. That did not demonstrate that the Tribunal took into account irrelevant material or otherwise went beyond jurisdiction, so no arguable case for an order nisi was shown.

Court Disposition

Application for an order nisi refused with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application for an order nisi be refused.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application, including the costs incurred before the High Court of Australia."]