Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing CorporationCitation:[2016] HCA 47Before:French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler, Nettle, Gordon JJDate:07 Dec 2016Case Number:S136/2016Read more
References to a non-existent entity in the undertakings and applications, resulting from a common mistake, may be rectified to refer to the correct counterparty if there is clear evidence of the parties' actual or true common intention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant (name not provided); Respondent: Respondent (name not provided)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- rectification granted
- Legal Topics
- Performance Bonds, Rectification, Construction of Contract Terms, Common Mistake
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant (name not provided)
Applicant
Respondent (name not provided)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether references to a non-existent entity in performance bonds and finance applications can be construed as references to the counterparty to the construction contract
- 2 Whether rectification is available to correct references to a non-existent entity resulting from a common mistake
Ratio Decidendi
References to a non-existent entity in the undertakings and applications, resulting from a common mistake, may be rectified to refer to the correct counterparty if there is clear evidence of the parties' actual or true common intention.
Court Disposition
rectification granted
Orders
- References to the non-existent entity in the undertakings and applications are rectified to refer to the counterparty to the construction contract
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment