Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing CorporationCitation:[2016] HCA 47Before:French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler, Nettle, Gordon JJDate:07 Dec 2016Case Number:S136/2016Read more

Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing CorporationCitation:[2016] HCA 47Before:French CJ, Kiefel, Gageler, Nettle, Gordon JJDate:07 Dec 2016Case Number:S136/2016Read more

References to a non-existent entity in the undertakings and applications, resulting from a common mistake, may be rectified to refer to the correct counterparty if there is clear evidence of the parties' actual or true common intention.

Parties
Applicant: Applicant (name not provided); Respondent: Respondent (name not provided)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
rectification granted
Legal Topics
Performance Bonds, Rectification, Construction of Contract Terms, Common Mistake

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant (name not provided)

Applicant

Respondent (name not provided)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether references to a non-existent entity in performance bonds and finance applications can be construed as references to the counterparty to the construction contract
  2. 2 Whether rectification is available to correct references to a non-existent entity resulting from a common mistake

Ratio Decidendi

References to a non-existent entity in the undertakings and applications, resulting from a common mistake, may be rectified to refer to the correct counterparty if there is clear evidence of the parties' actual or true common intention.

Court Disposition

rectification granted

Orders

  • References to the non-existent entity in the undertakings and applications are rectified to refer to the counterparty to the construction contract