Applicant S1043 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2006] FCA 1674
The appellant identified no cogent or sustainable ground of appeal, the papers disclosed no available ground of appeal, and the Refugee Review Tribunal's adverse factual and credibility findings disclosed no reviewable error of law. The Federal Magistrate's decision was correct, and an adjournment was not appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'credibility Findings' 'error of Law' 'adjournment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrates Court erred in dismissing the application for judicial review of the Refugee Review Tribunal decision.' "Whether there was any sustainable ground of appeal or error of law concerning the Tribunal's factual and credibility findings." 'Whether the appeal should be adjourned so the appellant could consider afresh the position in Pakistan.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant identified no cogent or sustainable ground of appeal, the papers disclosed no available ground of appeal, and the Refugee Review Tribunal's adverse factual and credibility findings disclosed no reviewable error of law. The Federal Magistrate's decision was correct, and an adjournment was not appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment