Applicant S105/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1020

Applicant S105/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1020

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Federal Magistrate did not err in dismissing the application as an abuse of process, in light of extensive prior litigation and the Tribunal's lack of jurisdiction over a second review application on the same visa refusal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 July 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'abuse of Process' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['judicial Review' 'abuse of Process' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application as incompetent and an abuse of process' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain a second review application for a protection visa refusal']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Federal Magistrate did not err in dismissing the application as an abuse of process, in light of extensive prior litigation and the Tribunal's lack of jurisdiction over a second review application on the same visa refusal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the Minister's costs." 'Costs be fixed in the sum of $800.']