Applicant S1152 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 512

Applicant S1152 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 512

The appellant had ample time to obtain legal assistance, had previously been legally represented, made no assertion that he had consulted pro bono schemes, and gave unspecific evidence about possible funds from Sri Lanka. No sufficient reason was advanced to vacate the appeal hearing fixed for 8 May 2006.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Notice of Motion to Vacate the Hearing of an Appeal Fixed for 8 May 2006
Outcome
Notice of motion dismissed; appeal fixture confirmed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa Refusal' 'refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'application to Vacate Hearing' 'self Represented Appellant' 'legal Representation']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['protection Visa Refusal' 'refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'application to Vacate Hearing' 'self Represented Appellant' 'legal Representation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Notice of Motion to Vacate the Hearing of an Appeal Fixed for 8 May 2006

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the hearing of the appeal fixed for 8 May 2006 should be vacated and re-fixed after July 2006 to allow the appellant to obtain legal assistance or funds for representation.' 'Whether the appellant advanced a sufficient reason for the appeal not to proceed on 8 May 2006.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had ample time to obtain legal assistance, had previously been legally represented, made no assertion that he had consulted pro bono schemes, and gave unspecific evidence about possible funds from Sri Lanka. No sufficient reason was advanced to vacate the appeal hearing fixed for 8 May 2006.

Court Disposition

Notice of motion dismissed; appeal fixture confirmed.

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion filed on 8 March 2006 be dismissed.' 'The matter be listed for hearing at 10:15am on Monday, 8 May 2006.']