S1794 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1591

S1794 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1591

The material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case that the Tribunal's Decision involved jurisdictional error, as there was no evidentiary support beyond the applicant's assertions.

Parties
Applicant: Applicant S1794 of 2003; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Application for Orders Nisi
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review, Protection Visa
Migration Law Administrative Law Jurisdictional Error Procedural Fairness Judicial Review Protection Visa

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Applicant S1794 of 2003

Applicant

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Application for Orders Nisi

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness to the applicant
  2. 2 Whether there was a jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision-making process

Ratio Decidendi

The material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case that the Tribunal's Decision involved jurisdictional error, as there was no evidentiary support beyond the applicant's assertions.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply to the proceeding
  • The application for orders nisi be refused