S222 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1600

S222 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1600

The material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case that the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error; mere assertion of grounds without particulars or evidence does not support the grant of relief.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness']
['immigration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in affirming the delegate's decision to refuse a protection visa" 'Whether the Tribunal denied the applicant natural justice by failing to accord procedural fairness' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to provide the applicant opportunity to respond to adverse material']

Ratio Decidendi

The material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case that the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error; mere assertion of grounds without particulars or evidence does not support the grant of relief.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • ['Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply' 'The application for orders nisi be refused']