Applicant S230/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1189

The Court declined to make an order nisi because neither the materials filed in support of the application nor the applicant's submissions showed an arguable case for the making of such an order.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 25 August 2005
Procedural Posture: Application Remitted by the High Court Seeking an Order Nisi for the Issue of Constitutional Writs / Application for Order Nisi
Outcome: Application declined
Legal Topics: ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'constitutional Writs' 'order Nisi']

['migration' 'administrative Law' 'constitutional Law'] ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'constitutional Writs' 'order Nisi']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application Remitted by the High Court Seeking an Order Nisi for the Issue of Constitutional Writs / Application for Order Nisi

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the applicant had shown an arguable case for the making of an order nisi for the issue of Constitutional writs']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court declined to make an order nisi because neither the materials filed in support of the application nor the applicant's submissions showed an arguable case for the making of such an order.

Court Disposition

Application declined

Orders

['The application be declined.']