S239 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1584
The material before the Court does not disclose an arguable case for relief, as it consists of mere pleading and assertion without evidentiary support. No jurisdictional error or breach of procedural fairness is established.
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant S239 of 2003; First Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal; Second Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Orders Nisi; Reasons for Refusal
- Outcome
- Application for orders nisi refused
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice, Protection Visa Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant S239 of 2003
Applicant
Refugee Review Tribunal
First Respondent
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Orders Nisi; Reasons for Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed a jurisdictional error.
- 2 Whether proper procedures required by the Migration Act 1958 were observed.
- 3 Whether the applicant was denied procedural fairness and natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The material before the Court does not disclose an arguable case for relief, as it consists of mere pleading and assertion without evidentiary support. No jurisdictional error or breach of procedural fairness is established.
Court Disposition
Application for orders nisi refused
Orders
- Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply to the proceeding.
- The application for orders nisi be refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment