Applicant S254 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1197
Given the applicant's non-appearance at directions hearings and the steps taken by the Minister's solicitor to notify the applicant at known addresses, it was appropriate to dismiss the application pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application Remitted From the High Court of Australia / Directions Hearing; Application for Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'remittal From High Court' 'non Appearance' 'summary Dismissal' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Remitted From the High Court of Australia / Directions Hearing; Application for Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceeding should be summarily dismissed pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules after the applicant failed to appear.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the applicant's non-appearance at directions hearings and the steps taken by the Minister's solicitor to notify the applicant at known addresses, it was appropriate to dismiss the application pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules.' "The applicant pay the second respondent's costs." 'The second respondent notify the applicant at his last known address of these Orders and the terms of O 35 r 7(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment