S284 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1595

S284 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1595

The material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case that would support the grant of the relief claimed, as there was insufficient evidence suggesting the Tribunal committed a jurisdictional error. Orders nisi should be refused and Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Orders Nisi—consideration on the Papers Post Remitter From the High Court
Outcome
Application for orders nisi refused
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'natural Justice' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error']
['migration Law'] ['protection Visa' 'natural Justice' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Orders Nisi—consideration on the Papers Post Remitter From the High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to afford natural justice to the applicant' "Whether there was jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision-making process" 'Whether there is an arguable case for relief (orders nisi)']

Ratio Decidendi

The material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case that would support the grant of the relief claimed, as there was insufficient evidence suggesting the Tribunal committed a jurisdictional error. Orders nisi should be refused and Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply.

Court Disposition

Application for orders nisi refused

Orders

  • ['Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply to the proceeding.' 'The application for orders nisi be refused.']