Applicant S288 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2005] FCA 1187
After considering the papers, the applicant's submissions and the Refugee Review Tribunal decision, the Court held that none of the applicant's grounds was fairly arguable and therefore it was inappropriate to grant an order nisi.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Order Nisi Concerning a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application for an order nisi refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'order Nisi' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order Nisi Concerning a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether any of the applicant's grounds concerning the Refugee Review Tribunal decision was fairly arguable so as to justify granting an order nisi."]
Ratio Decidendi
After considering the papers, the applicant's submissions and the Refugee Review Tribunal decision, the Court held that none of the applicant's grounds was fairly arguable and therefore it was inappropriate to grant an order nisi.
Court Disposition
Application for an order nisi refused.
Orders
- ['Subrule (1) of Order 51A rule 5 not apply to this application.' 'The application for an order nisi be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment