S299 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1599
The material before the Court does not disclose an arguable case that the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error in making its decision, so relief is refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'natural Justice' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'natural Justice' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal followed proper procedure under the Migration Act 1958' 'Whether the decision was made in breach of rules of natural justice' 'Whether an arguable case for jurisdictional error exists']
Ratio Decidendi
The material before the Court does not disclose an arguable case that the Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error in making its decision, so relief is refused.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- ['Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply to the proceeding.' 'The application for orders nisi be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment