Applicant S329 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (No. 2) [2006] FCA 1584
Because it was drawn to the Court's attention after the hearing that no order had been made joining the Refugee Review Tribunal, the Court ordered that the Tribunal be joined as second respondent and varied order 2 of the orders made on 8 November 2006 by substituting 'first respondent' for 'respondent'.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Orders Made in Chambers After Hearing
- Outcome
- Refugee Review Tribunal joined as second respondent and order 2 of the orders made on 8 November 2006 varied.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Refugee Review Tribunal' 'variation of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Orders Made in Chambers After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal should be joined as the second respondent to the application.' "Whether order 2 of the orders made on 8 November 2006 should be varied by substituting the words 'first respondent' for the word 'respondent'."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because it was drawn to the Court's attention after the hearing that no order had been made joining the Refugee Review Tribunal, the Court ordered that the Tribunal be joined as second respondent and varied order 2 of the orders made on 8 November 2006 by substituting 'first respondent' for 'respondent'.
Court Disposition
Refugee Review Tribunal joined as second respondent and order 2 of the orders made on 8 November 2006 varied.
Orders
- ['The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as the second respondent to the application.' "Order 2 of the orders, made on 8 November 2006, be varied by substituting the words 'first respondent' for the word 'respondent'."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment