Applicant S506 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 450
The affidavit in support of the application for an order nisi disclosed no basis for relief, and given the history of litigation concerning the same decision, the Court refused the order nisi and imposed restrictions on further applications concerning the same Tribunal decision.
- Parties
- Applicant: Applicant S506 of 2003; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Principal Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal; Third Respondent: Roslyn Smidt
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / On Remittal From the High Court; Application for Order Nisi
- Outcome
- Application for order nisi refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Constitutional Writs, Immigration Decisions, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Applicant S506 of 2003
Applicant
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
First Respondent
Principal Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Roslyn Smidt
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / On Remittal From the High Court; Application for Order Nisi
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether relief should be granted by way of order nisi regarding the Refugee Review Tribunal decision of 14 January 2002 given prior litigation and lack of disclosed grounds.
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit in support of the application for an order nisi disclosed no basis for relief, and given the history of litigation concerning the same decision, the Court refused the order nisi and imposed restrictions on further applications concerning the same Tribunal decision.
Court Disposition
Application for order nisi refused.
Orders
- The application for an order nisi be refused.
- The applicant pay the Minister's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment