Ginos Engineers Pty Ltd v Autodesk Inc [2009] FCA 183

Ginos Engineers Pty Ltd v Autodesk Inc [2009] FCA 183

There is no evidence of special reasons explaining the delay in filing the notice of appeal, and the proposed grounds of appeal have no prospects of success; therefore, the application for an extension of time is refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal / Interlocutory
Outcome
application for extension of time refused
Legal Topics
['application for Extension of Time' 'notice of Appeal' 'costs']
['civil Procedure'] ['application for Extension of Time' 'notice of Appeal' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether special reasons exist to extend time for filing notice of appeal' 'Whether applicants have prospects of success on appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

There is no evidence of special reasons explaining the delay in filing the notice of appeal, and the proposed grounds of appeal have no prospects of success; therefore, the application for an extension of time is refused.

Court Disposition

application for extension of time refused

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal be refused.' "The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the application as taxed or agreed."]