Power v Bassett (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1398
It is appropriate to exercise discretion to make a lump sum costs order for $5,000 because the sum is reasonable, represents about 80% of total lawfully incurred costs, and it would be unreasonable to require a further assessment given the modesty of the claim and pace of proceedings.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/judgment Creditor: Bianca Power; Defendant/judgment Debtor: Matthew Bassett
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Costs Determination Following Refusal of Payment by Instalments
- Outcome
- Application for gross sum costs order allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Application for Order of Payment by Instalments, Award of Costs, Gross Sum Costs, Reasonableness of Fees and Disbursements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bianca Power
Plaintiff/judgment Creditor
Matthew Bassett
Defendant/judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Costs Determination Following Refusal of Payment by Instalments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a lump sum costs order should be made for the application for payment by instalments
- 2 Whether the sum claimed for costs is reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
It is appropriate to exercise discretion to make a lump sum costs order for $5,000 because the sum is reasonable, represents about 80% of total lawfully incurred costs, and it would be unreasonable to require a further assessment given the modesty of the claim and pace of proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application for gross sum costs order allowed.
Orders
- The judgment debtor to pay the judgment creditor's costs of and incidental to the application for payment by instalments in a lump sum of $5,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment