SZTRB v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCA 336

SZTRB v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCA 336

Leave to appeal was refused as there was no prospect of success; no jurisdictional error was identified in the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision, and the applicants did not comply with orders to file written submissions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['application for Protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs']
['migration'] ['application for Protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted against judgment of the Federal Circuit Court' 'Whether applicants established jurisdictional error by the Refugee Review Tribunal' 'Whether failure to file written submissions warrants dismissal of application']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused as there was no prospect of success; no jurisdictional error was identified in the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision, and the applicants did not comply with orders to file written submissions.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the first respondent's costs as taxed if not agreed."]