PT Limited v NB2 Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 484
Leave to reopen was refused as mitigation of loss had not been pleaded nor had evidence been adduced at the hearing; discovery did not establish mitigation as a live pleaded issue, and additional evidence would not alter the outcome.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Reopen / Judgment After Hearing on Notice of Motion for Leave to Reopen
- Outcome
- Notice of motion to reopen dismissed; judgment and orders made as per agreed form.
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Reopen' 'mitigation of Loss' 'judgment Enforcement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Reopen / Judgment After Hearing on Notice of Motion for Leave to Reopen
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to reopen the case to adduce further evidence on mitigation of loss' 'Whether plaintiffs made good their claim for loss and responded to mitigation arguments']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to reopen was refused as mitigation of loss had not been pleaded nor had evidence been adduced at the hearing; discovery did not establish mitigation as a live pleaded issue, and additional evidence would not alter the outcome.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion to reopen dismissed; judgment and orders made as per agreed form.
Orders
- ['Give judgment and make orders in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3 of the form of judgment initialled and dated today.' 'Direct that the exhibits be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment