Velkovski, Dimce & Ors v Ryan, Morgan John & Ors [1996] FCA 283
There is a serious question to be tried as to the validity of the administrators' appointment and their suitability, competence, and impartiality; balance of convenience required replacement on an interlocutory basis to protect creditors' interests, especially given prior involvement of administrators with chargees and lack of proper investigation and reporting.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Dimce Velkovski; Second Applicant: ATTIA Imports Pty Limited; Third Applicant: Cobe International Pty Limited; First Respondent: Morgan John Ryan; Second Respondent: Robert William Waterhouse; Third Respondent: Stephen Winston Lewis; Fourth Respondent: Peter John Ryan; Fifth Respondent: Geoffrey David McDonald; Sixth Respondent: Timothy Paul Heesh; Seventh Respondent: Discount Acceptance Corporation Pty Limited; Eighth Respondent: Nitram Investments Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Orders and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders replacing administrators and appointing new administrator and receiver-manager; application for stay refused.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment and Removal of Administrators, Charge Enforcement, Balance of Convenience, Interlocutory Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dimce Velkovski
First Applicant
ATTIA Imports Pty Limited
Second Applicant
Cobe International Pty Limited
Third Applicant
Morgan John Ryan
First Respondent
Robert William Waterhouse
Second Respondent
Stephen Winston Lewis
Third Respondent
Peter John Ryan
Fourth Respondent
Geoffrey David McDonald
Fifth Respondent
Timothy Paul Heesh
Sixth Respondent
Discount Acceptance Corporation Pty Limited
Seventh Respondent
Nitram Investments Pty Limited
Eighth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Corporations Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Orders and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Validity of administrators' appointment under Corporations Law
- 2 Whether administrators should be removed from office under s 449B
- 3 Serious question regarding moneys owed under charge
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried as to the validity of the administrators' appointment and their suitability, competence, and impartiality; balance of convenience required replacement on an interlocutory basis to protect creditors' interests, especially given prior involvement of administrators with chargees and lack of proper investigation and reporting.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders replacing administrators and appointing new administrator and receiver-manager; application for stay refused.
Orders
- Geoffrey David McDonald and Timothy Paul Heesh removed as administrators of ATTIA Imports Pty Limited until further order.
- Maxwell William Prentice appointed as administrator of ATTIA Imports Pty Limited until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment