Cennzeal Pty Ltd & Anor v Dawson Properties (Ventures) Pty Ltd & Ors [2017] NSWSC 956
The judge found that the complaints raised by the applicant were vague, lacked detail, and did not identify specific conduct or statements that would support a reasonable apprehension of bias. No factual basis or particulars were provided which could ground a finding of apparent bias, and no objection had been made at the relevant time. Therefore, the application for recusal was not sustained and must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Disqualification / Interlocutory Application Ruling
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'judicial Recusal' 'security for Costs' 'case Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Disqualification / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the judge should disqualify himself for apprehended bias']
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that the complaints raised by the applicant were vague, lacked detail, and did not identify specific conduct or statements that would support a reasonable apprehension of bias. No factual basis or particulars were provided which could ground a finding of apparent bias, and no objection had been made at the relevant time. Therefore, the application for recusal was not sustained and must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Application for recusal or disqualification is dismissed.' 'All applications stand over for 14 days to allow the plaintiff to consider making an application to the Court of Appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment