Barber v R; Zraika v R [2016] NSWCCA 125
Although the trial judge erred in discharging the jury before the applicants' cases were considered, once the jury was discharged and released, the prospect of prejudice was so great that the court could not safely grant relief by recalling or considering the reconstitution of the jury; thus, leave to appeal was granted, but the appeals were dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['discharge of Jury' 'right to Verdict' 'jury Directions' 'stay of Decision' 'application for Leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in discharging the jury with respect to the applicants before the jury considered their charges' 'Whether relief was available after the discharge had taken effect and the jury released']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the trial judge erred in discharging the jury before the applicants' cases were considered, once the jury was discharged and released, the prospect of prejudice was so great that the court could not safely grant relief by recalling or considering the reconstitution of the jury; thus, leave to appeal was granted, but the appeals were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeals dismissed.
Orders
- ['Grant applicants leave to appeal, but dismiss the appeal.' 'Vacate the stay.' 'Direct the Sheriff to advise jurors that they have been finally discharged, as ordered by the trial judge on Thursday 9 June 2016.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment