APT v R [2009] NSWCCA 230

APT v R [2009] NSWCCA 230

The sentencing judge did not err in the exercise of discretion or fail to give sufficient weight to rehabilitation; all relevant factors, including youth, prospects of rehabilitation, seriousness of the crime and lack of prior convictions, were appropriately considered.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment on Severity of Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'sentencing' 'young Offender' 'severity of Sentence' 'rehabilitation' 'judicial Discretion']
['criminal Law'] ['manslaughter' 'sentencing' 'young Offender' 'severity of Sentence' 'rehabilitation' 'judicial Discretion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment on Severity of Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge failed to give sufficient weight to rehabilitation, resulting in a manifestly excessive sentence for a young offender convicted of manslaughter.']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not err in the exercise of discretion or fail to give sufficient weight to rehabilitation; all relevant factors, including youth, prospects of rehabilitation, seriousness of the crime and lack of prior convictions, were appropriately considered.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed. Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • []