AQV16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 134
The Appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the Federal Circuit Court Judge's decision. The Federal Circuit Court correctly identified and applied the principles governing review of credibility findings for illogicality, irrationality or unreasonableness, and the Tribunal's adverse credibility assessment had a logical and probative basis open to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court / Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings' 'illogicality, Irrationality and Unreasonableness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court / Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in finding that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error by making illogical, unreasonable or irrational adverse credibility findings.' 'Whether the Appellant demonstrated error in the Federal Circuit Court decision.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the Federal Circuit Court Judge's decision. The Federal Circuit Court correctly identified and applied the principles governing review of credibility findings for illogicality, irrationality or unreasonableness, and the Tribunal's adverse credibility assessment had a logical and probative basis open to it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The Appellant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent of and incidental to the appeal to be taxed in default of agreement.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment