Arap No. 1 (NSW) Pty Ltd v Hudson [2017] NSWSC 718

Arap No. 1 (NSW) Pty Ltd v Hudson [2017] NSWSC 718

No proper basis was shown for granting a stay of execution of the writ of possession where the proceedings were settled at mediation, and Mr Hudson was represented; dissatisfaction or recent illness do not constitute sufficient grounds.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Possession Proceedings / Notice of Motion Seeking Stay of Execution Post Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['possession of Land' 'stay of Execution']
['real Property'] ['possession of Land' 'stay of Execution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Possession Proceedings / Notice of Motion Seeking Stay of Execution Post Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there is any proper basis for the grant of a stay of execution of the writ of possession']

Ratio Decidendi

No proper basis was shown for granting a stay of execution of the writ of possession where the proceedings were settled at mediation, and Mr Hudson was represented; dissatisfaction or recent illness do not constitute sufficient grounds.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ["First Defendant's Notice of Motion seeking stay of execution of writ of possession dismissed"]