Singh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2018] FCA 1789
The application failed because the applicant did not advance any arguable case of error or denial of procedural fairness, could not satisfy a mandatory statutory requirement for the visa, and there was no prospect of success on appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed. Applicant to pay the Minister's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'medical Treatment (visitor) Visa']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an adequate reason was provided for the delay in applying for leave to appeal' 'Whether the proposed appeal had merit' 'Whether procedural fairness or natural justice was denied by the summary dismissal and refusal to reinstate judicial review proceeding']
Ratio Decidendi
The application failed because the applicant did not advance any arguable case of error or denial of procedural fairness, could not satisfy a mandatory statutory requirement for the visa, and there was no prospect of success on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed. Applicant to pay the Minister's costs.
Orders
- ["The name of the first respondent be changed to 'Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs'." 'The application for extension of time and leave to appeal filed on 11 May 2018 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment