ARD v Victims Compensation Fund Corporation [2014] NSWCATAD 153
ARD did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that she was the victim of an act of violence by NSW Police officers during the relevant period; evidence was vague, contradictory, and insufficiently cogent to meet the statutory standard for compensation.
- Parties
- Appellant: ARD; Respondent: Victims Compensation Fund Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Compensation Assessor Decision / Final Determination After Hearing
- Outcome
- Decision of compensation assessor affirmed; costs awarded to ARD.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Balance of Probabilities, Act of Violence, Compensable Injury, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ARD
Appellant
Victims Compensation Fund Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Compensation Assessor Decision / Final Determination After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ARD is a primary victim of an act of violence under the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996
- 2 Whether the evidence satisfies the balance of probabilities standard for an act of violence
- 3 Whether further evidence should be admitted
Ratio Decidendi
ARD did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that she was the victim of an act of violence by NSW Police officers during the relevant period; evidence was vague, contradictory, and insufficiently cogent to meet the statutory standard for compensation.
Court Disposition
Decision of compensation assessor affirmed; costs awarded to ARD.
Orders
- Pursuant to section 38(5)(a) of the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996, affirm the decision of the compensation assessor.
- Pursuant to section 35(1) of the Victims Support and Rehabilitation Act 1996, make an award of costs in the sum of $1,500.00 plus GST if applicable in accordance with Clause 5.6 of the ADT Guideline of 23 September 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment