Pandamooz v R [2023] NSWCCA 221
None of the alleged errors or irregularities—whether in jury directions about intoxication and consent, the admission of certain evidence, or aspects of the prosecutor's cross-examination and submissions—had the tendency to affect the verdicts or result in a miscarriage of justice; timely directions were appropriately given and agreed to by trial counsel; the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Aref Pandamooz; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Sexual Offences, Consent, Jury Directions, Miscarriage of Justice, Evidence – Admissibility, Intoxication, Opinion Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aref Pandamooz
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Conviction Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in jury directions regarding consent and intoxication
- 2 Whether the trial miscarried due to directions or admission of certain evidence
- 3 Whether improper opinion evidence was admitted
Ratio Decidendi
None of the alleged errors or irregularities—whether in jury directions about intoxication and consent, the admission of certain evidence, or aspects of the prosecutor's cross-examination and submissions—had the tendency to affect the verdicts or result in a miscarriage of justice; timely directions were appropriately given and agreed to by trial counsel; the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Grant leave to the applicant pursuant to r 4.15 of the Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW)
- Grant leave to appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment