Konami Gaming Inc v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 92

Konami Gaming Inc v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 92

The disputed patent claims are construed such that 'round of a game' in claim 1 refers to the commencement of a normal game, but may encompass an award or bonus game; certain integers in claim 1 are limited to normal game play, whereas claims 1 and 4 together encompass a bonus game; claim 7 is limited to a bonus game; and 'independent' in claim 9 is to be given its ordinary English meaning, indicating the pair of columns and the location of the trigger condition are not contingent upon each other.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Patent Construction Dispute / Advance Determination of Claim Construction
Outcome
Patent claims construed as specified; advance determination of claim construction granted.
Legal Topics
['patent Claim Construction' 'gaming Machine Patents' 'interpretation of Claim Terms']
['intellectual Property' 'patents'] ['patent Claim Construction' 'gaming Machine Patents' 'interpretation of Claim Terms']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Patent Construction Dispute / Advance Determination of Claim Construction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether claim 1 is limited to normal game play' "Meaning of key terms within claim 1 ('round of a game','spin the symbols','arrange the symbols in the same order')" 'Construction of claim 4 as dependent on claim 1' 'Scope of claim 7 (normal or bonus games)' "Meaning of 'independent' in claim 9"]

Ratio Decidendi

The disputed patent claims are construed such that 'round of a game' in claim 1 refers to the commencement of a normal game, but may encompass an award or bonus game; certain integers in claim 1 are limited to normal game play, whereas claims 1 and 4 together encompass a bonus game; claim 7 is limited to a bonus game; and 'independent' in claim 9 is to be given its ordinary English meaning, indicating the pair of columns and the location of the trigger condition are not contingent upon each other.

Court Disposition

Patent claims construed as specified; advance determination of claim construction granted.

Orders

  • ["'Round of a game' in claim 1 construed as commencement of a normal game in which an award or bonus game may be obtained." 'Integers (b), (c) and (d) of claim 1 limited to a normal game.' 'Claims 1 and 4, read together, construed to encompass a bonus game.' 'Claim 7 limited to a bonus game.' "'Independent' in claim...