R v NOLAN; R v ILIEVSKI; R v KWU [2021] NSWDC 202
Significant planning, coordination and execution in company of a violent, armed robbery with a loaded firearm, resulting in direct psychological harm well beyond that anticipated by the nature of the offence, and the creation of sophisticated alibi attempts, warranted sentences towards the higher end of the range for offences of this kind. Absence of remorse, significant criminal antecedents, and need for deterrence reinforced lengthy custodial terms. Sentencing parity and the ceiling principle required equivalent terms for principal participants and an aggregate for Ilievski reflecting his additional offences; discounts were applied only where pleas were entered.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: NOLAN, Shane Lawrence; Accused: ILIEVSKI, Tony; Accused: KWU, Muhammad Dean
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence After Trial (third Retrial)
- Outcome
- Nolan: Convicted on each count; sentenced to fixed and term imprisonment; Ilievski: Convicted; aggregate sentence imposed; Kwu: Convicted; sentenced to imprisonment; All: imprisoned, parole periods set. Any count subject to withdrawal was withdrawn and dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Armed Robbery, Aggravated Robbery, Being Armed With a Dangerous Weapon, Aggravated Break and Enter and Commit Serious Indictable Offence, Drive or Be Carried in a Conveyance, Circumstantial Evidence, Sentencing, Objective Seriousness, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Parole Eligibility, Aggravating Features, Planning and Execution of Offence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
NOLAN, Shane Lawrence
Accused
ILIEVSKI, Tony
Accused
KWU, Muhammad Dean
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence After Trial (third Retrial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentences for aggravated armed robbery with a dangerous weapon
- 2 Assessment of objective seriousness of the offences and roles of offenders
- 3 Application of sentencing principles, including 'ceiling principle,' totality, parity
Ratio Decidendi
Significant planning, coordination and execution in company of a violent, armed robbery with a loaded firearm, resulting in direct psychological harm well beyond that anticipated by the nature of the offence, and the creation of sophisticated alibi attempts, warranted sentences towards the higher end of the range for offences of this kind. Absence of remorse, significant criminal antecedents, and need for deterrence reinforced lengthy custodial terms. Sentencing parity and the ceiling principle required equivalent terms for principal participants and an aggregate for Ilievski reflecting his additional offences; discounts were applied only where pleas were entered.
Court Disposition
Nolan: Convicted on each count; sentenced to fixed and term imprisonment; Ilievski: Convicted; aggregate sentence imposed; Kwu: Convicted; sentenced to imprisonment; All: imprisoned, parole periods set. Any count subject to withdrawal was withdrawn and dismissed.
Orders
- Nolan: Fixed term of 20 months (steal/carried) from 18 Sep 2013 to 17 May 2015; 14 years imprisonment (armed robbery) with 9 year non-parole from 24 Dec 2015, eligible for parole 23 Dec 2024, balance 5 years to 23 Dec 2029; 001 – s166 matter withdrawn and dismissed.
- Ilievski: Aggregate sentence of 16 years with 10 years 6 months non-parole for armed robbery and aggravated break and enter, commencing 10 Jan 2018, eligible for parole 9 July 2028, balance 5 years 6 months to 9 Jan 2034; indicative sentences: 4y9m each (NPP 3y6.5m) for break/enter; 14 years for armed robbery.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment