Armidale Local Aboriginal Land Council v Transgrid [2000] NSWLEC 141
On the present evidence, the applicant has not established that the Indigenous Heritage Management Plan was not developed in consultation; there is no serious question to be tried, and delay in seeking relief together with prejudice to third parties disfavours grant of injunction.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Motion for Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunction' 'consultation Obligations' 'indigenous Heritage Protection' 'balance of Convenience' 'delay in Proceedings']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Motion for Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Indigenous Heritage Management Plan was developed in consultation with the applicant as required by condition 51' 'Whether there is a serious question to be tried for the grant of interlocutory injunction' 'Impact of delay and prejudice to third parties']
Ratio Decidendi
On the present evidence, the applicant has not established that the Indigenous Heritage Management Plan was not developed in consultation; there is no serious question to be tried, and delay in seeking relief together with prejudice to third parties disfavours grant of injunction.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed
Orders
- ["The applicant's notice of motion dated 12 May 2000 is dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment