Lawrance v Commonwealth (No 2) [2008] FCA 1060

Lawrance v Commonwealth (No 2) [2008] FCA 1060

The proceeding should be dismissed because the Appellant failed to comply with the order for security for costs, offered no explanation or likely prospects for compliance, and there is no material change in circumstances warranting extension or stay. Respondents are entitled to costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Dismissal for Non Compliance With Security for Costs Order
Outcome
Proceeding dismissed; costs ordered against Appellant
Legal Topics
['security for Costs' 'dismissal of Proceeding' 'compliance With Court Order' 'finality in Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure'] ['security for Costs' 'dismissal of Proceeding' 'compliance With Court Order' 'finality in Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Dismissal for Non Compliance With Security for Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceeding should be dismissed for non-compliance with orders for security for costs' 'Whether any change in circumstances justified an extension or stay']

Ratio Decidendi

The proceeding should be dismissed because the Appellant failed to comply with the order for security for costs, offered no explanation or likely prospects for compliance, and there is no material change in circumstances warranting extension or stay. Respondents are entitled to costs.

Court Disposition

Proceeding dismissed; costs ordered against Appellant

Orders

  • ['The proceeding be dismissed.' 'The Appellant to pay the costs of the First and Third to Thirteenth Respondents fixed in the sum of $7,500, including the costs previously ordered on 4 April 2008 and the costs of and incidental to the Notice of Motion as filed on 15 July 2008.' 'The Appellant to pay the costs of the...