Arrow Pharmaceuticals Limited v Merck & Co Inc. [2004] FCA 983
Document 6957 was not entitled to legal professional privilege because, although it referred to patentability and included views about that topic, those views did not on their face record or disclose legal advice; rather, the document considered practical steps that might be taken to advance the cause.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application Concerning Discovery and Claims for Legal Professional Privilege / Reasons for Ruling on Application for Leave to File a Motion Returnable Instanter
- Outcome
- The respondent was ordered to produce document 6957.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'patent Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application Concerning Discovery and Claims for Legal Professional Privilege / Reasons for Ruling on Application for Leave to File a Motion Returnable Instanter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether document 6957 was entitled to legal professional privilege.' 'Whether the respondent should produce document 6957.']
Ratio Decidendi
Document 6957 was not entitled to legal professional privilege because, although it referred to patentability and included views about that topic, those views did not on their face record or disclose legal advice; rather, the document considered practical steps that might be taken to advance the cause.
Court Disposition
The respondent was ordered to produce document 6957.
Orders
- ["The respondent produce the document numbered 6957 in Schedule 1 Part 2 of the respondent's list of documents certified on 9 October 2003."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment