Dent v Australian Electoral Commission [2007] FCA 2112
Mr Dent’s nomination did not specify a name under which he was entitled to be enrolled, given the recent refusal to include 'Arthur Dent' on the electoral roll and the upholding of that refusal; therefore, his application for interlocutory relief must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Arthur Dent; First Respondent: Australian Electoral Commission; Second Respondent: Daryl Wight
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Orders / Interlocutory Judgment on Application for Interlocutory Orders
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory orders dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Nomination for Senate, Rejection of Nomination, Enrolment on Electoral Roll, Interlocutory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arthur Dent
Applicant
Australian Electoral Commission
First Respondent
Daryl Wight
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Orders / Interlocutory Judgment on Application for Interlocutory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rejection of Mr Dent's nomination for the Senate was lawful under s 166(2)(b) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918
- 2 Whether interlocutory relief should be granted against the Electoral Officer in respect of the nomination rejection
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Dent’s nomination did not specify a name under which he was entitled to be enrolled, given the recent refusal to include 'Arthur Dent' on the electoral roll and the upholding of that refusal; therefore, his application for interlocutory relief must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory orders dismissed
Orders
- Mr Dent have leave to make an application against the Australian Electoral officer orally in court today.
- Mr Dent's application for interlocutory orders be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment