Kay and Ors v Wingecarribee Council [2007] NSWLEC 50
The court found that the works exceeded what could be considered a farm dam and amounted to unauthorised quarrying/extractive activity for which no development consent had been given. While the original order lacked some specificity, the power to make a cessation and rehabilitation order was validly exercised and should be modified to address deficiencies.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; modified order made
- Legal Topics
- ['section 121 B Order' 'unauthorised Quarrying' 'rehabilitation' 'development Consent Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the s 121B Order to cease all quarrying activities and rehabilitate the area was valid' 'Whether the works constituted quarrying requiring development consent' 'Adequacy of the reasons in the Order']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the works exceeded what could be considered a farm dam and amounted to unauthorised quarrying/extractive activity for which no development consent had been given. While the original order lacked some specificity, the power to make a cessation and rehabilitation order was validly exercised and should be modified to address deficiencies.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; modified order made
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed in part.' 'Pursuant to s 121B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the property owners are ordered to cease all material excavation/quarrying/transport activities at Lot 40 Inveray Road, Sutton Forest, from the date of these Orders.' 'The property owners are to submit a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment