Wallace v Dixon
The creation and deposit of plans before 30 March 1967, together with subsequent transfers of parcels as defined in those plans, amounted to a 'previous subdivision lawfully made' exempted by the Ordinance. Therefore, cl 4 did not render subsequent transfers ineffective, and the appellant was entitled to a declaration in those terms.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; order of the Supreme Court of Norfolk Island set aside; declaration granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['subdivision of Land' 'interpretation of Statutory Definitions' 'validity of Transfers Prior to Statute Commencement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant's actions constituted a 'previous subdivision lawfully made' under the Land (Sub-division) Ordinance 1967 of Norfolk Island" 'Whether cl 4 of the Ordinance rendered the transfer ineffective']
Ratio Decidendi
The creation and deposit of plans before 30 March 1967, together with subsequent transfers of parcels as defined in those plans, amounted to a 'previous subdivision lawfully made' exempted by the Ordinance. Therefore, cl 4 did not render subsequent transfers ineffective, and the appellant was entitled to a declaration in those terms.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; order of the Supreme Court of Norfolk Island set aside; declaration granted.
Orders
- ['Objection to competency overruled with costs.' 'Appeal allowed with costs.' 'Order of the Supreme Court of Norfolk Island set aside.' 'Declaration granted that the allotments referred to in Plan 43/4 and Plan S.044 constitute a previous subdivision lawfully made within the meaning of the Land (Sub-division)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment