Dyason v Hart [2001] NSWSC 943
Because all affected persons were parties, the Protective Commissioner's representatives were involved, and the mediated compromise provided a complete plan for how the solicitors were to advance the estate, the Court had power and there was no objection to granting administration to the two solicitors agreed by the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceeding Concerning Administration of a Deceased Estate / Orders Following Mediation and Compromise
- Outcome
- Orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['administrator' 'rival Administrators' 'appointment of Solicitors as Administrators' 'mediation Compromise']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceeding Concerning Administration of a Deceased Estate / Orders Following Mediation and Compromise
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could or should grant administration to two solicitors rather than to either party after a mediated compromise between the alleged de facto husband and the next of kin.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because all affected persons were parties, the Protective Commissioner's representatives were involved, and the mediated compromise provided a complete plan for how the solicitors were to advance the estate, the Court had power and there was no objection to granting administration to the two solicitors agreed by the parties.
Court Disposition
Orders made.
Orders
- ['Orders made in accordance with the short minutes initialled, dated and placed with the papers.' 'Matter referred to the Registrar to complete the grant.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment