Butterell v The Douglas Group Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 942
Reinsurance proceeds received by the liquidator of CEASA are to be distributed on a policy-year basis among insurance creditors whose claims exceed $350,000 and were notified in that year, proportionately in accordance with s 562A(3) of the Corporations Law. The Seerys do not have standing under s 562A(4) as they are not persons to whom monies are payable under a relevant contract of insurance; their rights, if any, are under statute, not under the contract. Liquidator may deduct expenses incurred in getting in reinsurance funds, including overheads, but not general litigation costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Directions by Liquidator / Declaratory Relief / Judgment on Application for Directions and Cross Claims
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief and directions substantially as per reasons; parties to bring in short minutes for final orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['winding Up' "liquidator's Directions" 'reinsurance Proceeds' 'statutory Charge Under Law Reform Act' 'declaratory Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Directions by Liquidator / Declaratory Relief / Judgment on Application for Directions and Cross Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 ['How reinsurance proceeds received by a liquidator should be distributed among insurance creditors of an insolvent mutual insurer under s 562A of the Corporations Law.' 'Whether the proceeds form a pool for all creditors, only those whose claims exceed $350,000, to particular claimants, or to policy year pools.' 'Whether the Seerys, as assignees of a judgment creditor, have a statutory charge or standing to make application regarding proceeds under s 562A(4).' 'Whether the liquidator may be indemnified from the proceeds for costs/expenses of administration.']
Ratio Decidendi
Reinsurance proceeds received by the liquidator of CEASA are to be distributed on a policy-year basis among insurance creditors whose claims exceed $350,000 and were notified in that year, proportionately in accordance with s 562A(3) of the Corporations Law. The Seerys do not have standing under s 562A(4) as they are not persons to whom monies are payable under a relevant contract of insurance; their rights, if any, are under statute, not under the contract. Liquidator may deduct expenses incurred in getting in reinsurance funds, including overheads, but not general litigation costs.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief and directions substantially as per reasons; parties to bring in short minutes for final orders.
Orders
- ['Declaration that reinsurance payments are to be distributed on a policy-year basis among claimants with claims over $350,000, notified within each relevant policy year.' 'Application by Seerys under s 562A(4) Corporations Law dismissed for lack of standing.' 'Costs of liquidator and first defendant to be paid from...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment