Winarczyk v Winarczyk [2011] NSWSC 407

Winarczyk v Winarczyk [2011] NSWSC 407

The plaintiff was an eligible person and, despite conduct that warranted restraint in the amount of provision, his financial circumstances, limited work prospects and need for contingencies meant he had not been left with adequate proper provision. The defendant had received the whole modest estate and had better assets and work prospects. Substantial justice supported designating the defendant's unit as notional estate to the extent necessary and awarding the plaintiff $75,000 with interest.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Application in Respect of the Estate of the Late Janina Ewa Winarczyk Under the Family Provision Act / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed in part; defendant's property designated as notional estate to satisfy a $75,000 legacy and interest for the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
['eligible Person' 'adequate Provision for Proper Maintenance, Education and Advancement in Life' 'estrangement and Conduct' 'notional Estate' 'costs']
['succession' 'family Provision'] ['eligible Person' 'adequate Provision for Proper Maintenance, Education and Advancement in Life' 'estrangement and Conduct' 'notional Estate' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application in Respect of the Estate of the Late Janina Ewa Winarczyk Under the Family Provision Act / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff, as a son of the deceased, was left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance, education and advancement in life.' "Whether the plaintiff's conduct and the estrangement arising from family conflict should defeat or reduce his claim." 'What provision, if any, should be made for the plaintiff from a modest estate already distributed to the defendant.' "Whether the defendant's property should be designated as notional estate to satisfy any family provision order."]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was an eligible person and, despite conduct that warranted restraint in the amount of provision, his financial circumstances, limited work prospects and need for contingencies meant he had not been left with adequate proper provision. The defendant had received the whole modest estate and had better assets and work prospects. Substantial justice supported designating the defendant's unit as notional estate to the extent necessary and awarding the plaintiff $75,000 with interest.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; defendant's property designated as notional estate to satisfy a $75,000 legacy and interest for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • ["The defendant's property identified in folio identifier xxxx as notional estate to the extent necessary to meet the following orders." 'The plaintiff is to receive a legacy of $75,000 out of the notional estate of the deceased.' "Interest at the rate provided for under the Probate & Administration Act 1898 to run...