Crane v Gething [2000] FCA 762

Crane v Gething [2000] FCA 762

The appeal was dismissed because the declaratory relief sought would require findings on disputed factual matters that were the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation and would unproductively interfere with the ordinary processes of investigation and prosecution of suspected offences.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Declaratory Relief in Connection With a Criminal Investigation / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['declaratory Relief' 'criminal Investigation' 'search Warrant' 'interference With Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Offences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia Concerning Declaratory Relief in Connection With a Criminal Investigation / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should grant declaratory relief where the claim was made after a criminal investigation had commenced and collateral to an attack on a search warrant issued in connection with that investigation.' 'Whether declaratory relief should be entertained where it depends upon findings on factual matters that are themselves under investigation and not conceded by the third respondent.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the declaratory relief sought would require findings on disputed factual matters that were the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation and would unproductively interfere with the ordinary processes of investigation and prosecution of suspected offences.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed with costs.']