AS v Murray [2013] NSWSC 733
The court found on uncontradicted evidence that the defendant extorted money from the plaintiff by means of threats amounting to the tort of intimidation, entitling the plaintiff to recover the sum paid, injunctions, exemplary damages, and costs on an indemnity basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Hearing in Absence of Defendant
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff with injunctive relief, damages, exemplary damages, interest, and indemnity costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['tort of Intimidation' 'extortion' 'exemplary Damages' 'injunctive Relief' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Hearing in Absence of Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant committed the tort of intimidation against the plaintiff' 'Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of monies paid, injunctions, exemplary damages, and indemnity costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on uncontradicted evidence that the defendant extorted money from the plaintiff by means of threats amounting to the tort of intimidation, entitling the plaintiff to recover the sum paid, injunctions, exemplary damages, and costs on an indemnity basis.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff with injunctive relief, damages, exemplary damages, interest, and indemnity costs.
Orders
- ['The defendant is restrained from communicating to any person any representation in relation to the plaintiff.' "The defendant is restrained from communicating in any form with the plaintiff other than by communicating with the plaintiff's solicitors." 'Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment