AS + VUT Pty Limited v Marrickville Council [2007] NSWLEC 328

AS + VUT Pty Limited v Marrickville Council [2007] NSWLEC 328

The Court upheld the appeal by consent because the revised proposal met the need for the substation, caused no net effective reduction in car parking, and provided a significant heritage benefit by retaining more of the heritage façade in an undisturbed form, subject to revised plans and settled conditions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning an Application Pursuant to S 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to Modify Development Consent 2003/00511 / Ex Tempore Judgment; Appeal Upheld by Consent Subject to Filing of Revised Plans and Settled Conditions
Outcome
Appeal upheld by consent; Development Consent 2003/00511 modified subject to revised detailed conditions and the filing of revised plans and settled conditions.
Legal Topics
['development Consent Modification' 'heritage Façade' 'electricity Substation' 'car Parking' 'consent Orders']
['planning and Environment Law'] ['development Consent Modification' 'heritage Façade' 'electricity Substation' 'car Parking' 'consent Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Concerning an Application Pursuant to S 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to Modify Development Consent 2003/00511 / Ex Tempore Judgment; Appeal Upheld by Consent Subject to Filing of Revised Plans and Settled Conditions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Development Consent 2003/00511 should be modified to incorporate an electricity substation serving 31-45 Australia Street, Camperdown.' 'Whether the revised proposal would avoid unacceptable intrusion into the Denison Street heritage façade while addressing car parking and access changes.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court upheld the appeal by consent because the revised proposal met the need for the substation, caused no net effective reduction in car parking, and provided a significant heritage benefit by retaining more of the heritage façade in an undisturbed form, subject to revised plans and settled conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld by consent; Development Consent 2003/00511 modified subject to revised detailed conditions and the filing of revised plans and settled conditions.

Orders

  • []